![]() ![]() For reasons to do with the complex question of authorship and possibly others, consequently, scholars have tended to focus on the work of Bonaventure, who arguably incorporates the insights of his teachers into his own creative synthesis, and on later thinkers like John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham, who developed Franciscan insights in new and even ‘modern’ directions. While Alexander's own work may have been the basis for a good many of these, his chief collaborator and colleague, John of La Rochelle, is also believed to have acted as a major contributor, with others like William of Melitona and Odo Rigaldi playing roles as well. One reason for this neglect may have to do with the difficulties involved in determining the precise author of various sections of the Summa. At least until recently, however, this important text has not received much attention from scholars. ![]() The famous early Franciscan Bonaventure appears to have had much of it at his fingertips, though he may have contributed to later sections himself, and to have regarded it as a key resource in his own training in the burgeoning Franciscan intellectual tradition. The Summa minorum or Summa Halensis, long attributed mistakenly to Alexander of Hales, the founder of the Franciscan intellectual tradition, was known in its own time as the first comprehensive and systematic effort to lay down distinctly Franciscan theological and philosophical perspectives. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |